A Trip of a Lifetime

August 5, 2011

 

3 guys, 44 days, 11 countries, 18 flights, 38 thousand miles, an exploding volcano, 2 cameras and almost a terabyte of footage… all to turn 3 ambitious linear concepts based on movement, learning and food ….into 3 beautiful and hopefully compelling short films…..
= a trip of a lifetime.

move, eat, learn

Rick Mereki : Director, producer, additional camera and editing
Tim White : DOP, producer, primary editing, sound
Andrew Lees : Actor, mover, groover


yet2.com Webinar – April 21st – Improve deal-making process

April 19, 2011


Join us to hear how experienced deal-makers are succeeding, at our upcoming webinar:

Conference Preview: Successful Deal-making with Small Companies April 21, 2011, 11:00am EST.

We’ll be discussing relationship building, cross-cultural appreciation, ongoing consulting, and step-wise deal structures, among other topics. We’ve gathered representatives from both the small and big company perspectives to share their thoughts — tune in to learn how you can hasten and improve your own deal process.

Webinar speakers:

Steve Baggott, Director, External Business Development, Procter & Gamble
Robert Michelson, President, Butler Home Products
Dr. Greg Williams, Director of Research and Development, Monteco Ltd.

April’s webinar is an exclusive preview of a live panel discussion to be held at yet2.com’s upcoming Open Innovation conference in May, in Boston.

Register today for the Successful Deal-making with Small Companies Preview Webinar here:

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/311188682


5 IP Legal Mistakes Small Companies Make When Working with Large Companies

March 8, 2011

Open Innovation Legal Insights

Jackie Hutter is my favorite IP attorney in open innovation.  She has done a lot of interesting deals and represented both large and small companies.  Below is a great article by her – Ben

Small companies CAN effectively partner with large companies in Open Innovation…

Open Innovation guru Stefan Lindegaard recently asked me what the biggest IP legal mistakes small companies make when they are working with large companies. This is a subject very near and dear to my heart, as I am currently “moonlighting” as GC of a start up energy company that is moving toward licensing our technology into large companies. Also, as a senior IP lawyer at a multi-national consumer products company, I was on the other side of such deals on more occasions than I can count. Prior to that, I was a law firm partner representing large and small corporations in patents and licensing issues, and in doing so, I now realize that I killed more deals than I ever facilitated, a situation that is more typical of law firm lawyers than it should be, unfortunately.

In view of this multi-faceted experience, I present this list of the 5 most common mistakes companies make when working with large companies in Open Innovation.

1. Thinking you have all the answers for the large company’s problems:

As a small company, you often have only have a single idea or technology and you quite properly focus your attention in this direction. This can be damaging to your ability to do complete an Open Innovation deal with a big company, however. The large company may not care about what you see as the value of your technology because they are the experts in their products and customers. Indeed, you may be wholly wrong about why the large company is interested in speaking to you. If you want to sell or license your technology to a large company, your best bet is to focus on the specific technology aspects, and leave the business and customer issues to the other side, at least at the early stages of discussion.

2. Bringing the wrong lawyer to the table:

Very often small companies assume the lawyer who handles their intellectual property issues is the appropriate person to bring to a conversation with the big company. However, the legal skills a small company needs to obtain its patent rights are very different than what are needed to get a deal done. While protection of your small company’s IP should be paramount in any dealings with the large company, putting up complicated restrictions about the use and ownership of your IP even before you know a deal is likely to happen, which is the natural inclination of most IP attorneys, can often end up in the other party walking away before a deal is even underway. I have found the best lawyers to negotiate deals in the Open Innovation context are business-focused attorneys, who tend to be people who have served a stint in the corporate world and who might even have little experience with high-end IP issues. It can be tough to find someone with these credentials, however. As an alternative, I like to work with licensing experts, most of whom have successfully closed most deals in a year than many law firm IP lawyers see in their entire careers. These licensing experts are frequently not lawyers, but they have negotiated enough agreements to be very good at spotting the legal issues and, in this regard, they often do a better job than lawyers.

3. Putting the legal issues ahead of the business issues:

Read the rest of this entry »


2011 Patent Buying Areas of Interest report

February 16, 2011

We’ve been buying and selling patents at yet2.com for over 11 years now. Over those years we have seen the areas of patent interest change quite substantially.  Today we released our 2011 Patent Buying Areas of Interest report. This years’ report breaks patents sales into four areas; Consumer Electronics, Wireless, Healthcare and Lighting.  Contact us for the full report, but below is a summary.

Most patent transactions are in industries where there are a high number of patents per product.  Consumer electronics leads the pack.  We are seeing an increase in interest in patents around the edges of consumer electronics, like hardware casing and metal bending. The patent market is coming back to a ‘new normal’, after the 2008 market disruption.  While transaction activity has picked back up, it’s still at 50% of pre 2008.

Patent Buying Interest Areas (2011)

1. Consumer Electronics

a) Image Capture / Image processing

b) Audio/Video

c) Memory

d) Compression / Decompression (“codec”)

e) Displays

f) Battery / Portable Power

g) Sensors Read the rest of this entry »


TED Talk by Carlos Oliveira Santos – About Open Innovation

January 18, 2011

This is a very clever talk by Carlos Oliveira Santos from TEDxEdges 2010.


VC had mixed results in Q3

November 5, 2010

The third quarter of 2010 had mixed results for Venture Capital.  The quantity invested was down, but the number of deals was up. Here is the short:

$5.4B in investments (down from $5.9 in Q2)

715 deals (up from 612 in Q2)

In terms of deals July was the most active month in the last 15

The # of seed deals has continued to increase (11% of Q3 deals)

A full article with figures can be found here:

http://www.cbinsights.com/blog/venture-capital/venture-capital-quarterly-report-q3-2010

*all data from this blog is from CBInsights


Why VC and Clean Energy Might Not Mix

November 4, 2010

There has been a lot of speculation that clean energy might be the next Biotechnology or Internet revolution.  While I think this would be great, lets’ explore some of the hurdles- that VC and clean energy business models might not mesh well – that we might need other funding sources.  Here are a few observations:

1) The Amount of Capital Needed

Starting a clean energy company can be extremely expensive and out of reach of the normal $300M VC fund. For example, Solyndra, a photovoltaic company has raised close to $1.5B in equity and debt financing.

2) The Payback does not justify the Risk.

Most clean energy companies require the construction of commercial plants for energy production, which may or may not be successful. This can be extremely capital intensive, as mention above, and have not defined exits strategy

3) Lack of Exit Options

Investments in clean energy companies are extremely illiquid.  Most VC Funds are set up on a 5 to 7-year model.  It could take longer than that to build and test the commercial viability of most new clean energy plants.  Additionally clearly developed eco-system where incumbents buy promising startups has yet to develop in the sector (think Apple, Microsoft, & Cisco).

4)Managerial Experience.

The three important factors for determining an investment in VC are 1) Management 2) Management and 3) Management.  In the clean energy sector most of the entrepreneurs come from large companies, primarily utilities.  They lack the experience in starting an early stage company, thus adding to the risk.

5) Energy is a Regulated Commodity

The price of energy is regulated in some markets. As the cost of inputs rises, the profit margins shrink adding one more risk to commercializing a new technology.

So if Venture Capital cant fund clean energy, who will?  Will VC’s change their model like Element Partners and the Potomac Energy Fund ?  Will large strategics step in like DuPont’s bet in bio-fuels?  Will the governments provide financing or incentives?


Do Deal-makers Evaluate ‘Live’ Presentations Like They Evaluate Written Ones?

October 9, 2010

On my long flights I get a chance to do some interesting reading – this time on the subect of the clarity of a presentation and how this might impact a technology deal or venture capital funding.  I came across Some very interesting research on this subject done by: Denis Gregoire, Alice Koning and Ben Oviatt on the impact of an in person pitch vs a submitted business plan or technology brief.

The research presents a study on the venture capitalists’ real-time opinions on entrepreneurs’ presentations. The authors base their analysis on real time responses submitted by 25 venture capitalists using dynamic response devices while the VC’s are evaluating 18 presentations at a real venture financing event. The authors compare the submitted responses with the particular moment in the entrepreneur’s presentation and identify what information venture capitalists considered influential for their decision to fund the venture.

The study revealed that presenters who were casually dressed and yet talked about their high experience, received negative ratings from the venture capitalists. In all other cases, highlighting of the entrepreneurs’ experience did not have any major impact on the VC’s.

Factors for Successful Business Pitches:

  • Entrepreneurs are dressed formally and look professional
  • The presentation is well organized and consistent – there are few leaps from one category to the other
  • Clearly articulated purpose of the venture – how the venture will address the problems of the customers
  • Entrepreneur focuses on a narrow and niche markets/industries
  • Entrepreneurs have patents for their products
  • The presentation is not longer than the time limit

Factors that have little impact on VC’s funding decisions (all entrepreneurs highlight these– so there is no differentiation)

  • Entrepreneurs have long experience in the industry
  • Highlighting of the capacity and abilities of the management team
  • Size of the market and potential growth of the venture
  • The position of the presenter (whether he/she is the founder, a hired executive or technology specialist)

Gregoire, Denis. Koning, Alice. Oviatt, Benjamin. 2008. “Do VC’s Evaluate ‘Live’ Presentations Like They Evaluate Business Plans?”. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Vol (28), No (3), Pp 1-15


Passion: What is its role in achieving VC funding?

October 1, 2010

A commonly held belief is that passion is highly influential in receiving funding.  Is this true? Sort of.

In a scientifically conducted study, a VC was no more likely to invest in a company with a passionate pitcher, then one with out. In other words passion alone has no statistical impact on investment in a new venture.

How could this be true?  Well the study suggest that passion is typically paired with preparation.  Preparation in a business plan and pitch is positively related to VC funding.

Big Picture: If you’re pitching VCs be as prepared for the conversation as possible.  The more prepared you are, the better your chances of getting funding are.  Passion of course, never hurts.

Source: ENTREPRENEUR PASSION AND PREPAREDNESS IN BUSINESS PLAN PRESENTATIONS: A PERSUASION ANALYSIS OF VENTURE CAPITALISTS’ FUNDING DECISIONS. XIAO-PING CHEN- University of Washington, XIN YAO- Wichita State University, SURESH KOTHA- University of Washington


The ‘Polite NO’, Can Sound Like A ‘Maybe’….it’s critical to understand the difference!

September 16, 2010

A critical skill for an entrepreneur is understanding the difference between a ‘maybe’ and a ‘polite no’.

It can be very hard to tell, and this can mean the the difference between life and death of a new technology.

The problem is most entrepreneurs are so aggressive and driven, they can steam roll right over the the ‘polite no’ so that it sounds like a ‘maybe’.

First some motivations.  When someone is evaluating your company or technology, they never actually want to say ‘no’, they in fact want you to keep perfecting it, to keep working, and to keep coming back until it is perfect  - and the investor or licensee can say ‘yes’ to a completely de-risked opportunity.  The problem is that you can go broke doing this, and you will never get to to objective – a completely perfect opportunity (if you do, give me a call, I’m always looking for the completely de-risked investment!).

The rare investor or licensee will say ‘no’.  Be VERY grateful if you get a ‘no’.  Spend time understanding how to improve and then thank them profusely.  99.9% will give you the ‘polite no’, which sounds nice, but can be evil.

Here are some telltale signs, to determine if you are getting a ‘polite no’:

1) There are no ‘to dos’ for the other side.  All the ‘to do’s’ are on your side.  This is a problem!

2) They stop asking substantive questions about the current technology.  In other word’s they have finished their evaluation.

3) They cant articulate their decision-making process ‘we’ll get back to you soon’.  This is a huge red-flag!

4) They are being overly personally nice! No reason for their ‘polite no’ to make you angry.

5) The dreaded phrase ‘thanks for coming by, please keep us in the loop’.  If you hear this, RUN.

What other telltale signs am I missing?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.