For the past few years I’ve co-hosted an interesting dinner, where I ask each guest to speak for less than 2 minutes on a way they think the world will change in the next 5 years – that is not obvious.
In December I hosted 70 leaders in a wide variety of disciplines – from horticulture to economics. The guest list included; 2 Governors, 7 CEO’s of companies of more than $2 billion in revenue, Chief Investment Officers of more than $38 Billion, 11 venture capitalists, etc….so you get the idea.
The 70 ideas were then voted on by each table, and below is a finalist – on ways the world will change that are not obvious. Please share your ideas on other non-obvious predictions and your thoughts about this one.
——————————————————————————————————————–
In the next 5 to 10 years there will be a ground breaking discovery. It is non-obvious that two significant changes over the last decade or so have set the stage for this event. Surprisingly, these factors have been working against such a discovery most of the 20th century.
For the last 50 years or so there has been significant growth and opportunity at the traditional institutions, think tanks, universities and other areas of higher thinking partly attributable to economic and population growth. If you were creative, bright and passionate, there was a place for you. “Hey come to do research at our University, you don’t even have to teach.”
These institutions, universities and etc. had huge competitive advantage due to economies of scale for ideas, access to resources and an environment to share ideas. If you weren’t within the system you were at a serious disadvantage because individuals could not get access to the necessary cutting edge information. These institutions have been effective moving technology and ideas forward step by step (i.e. string theory), but less successful at ground breaking discoveries.
The unintended consequence of this system has been to deter groundbreaking discoveries often proposed by young individual minds outside conventional structures. The young minds capable of making ground breaking discoveries were accepted into the existing system and comprised by conventional thinking. If they were outside the system they were cut off from the information necessary as a launching pad for ground breaking thought.
It is non-obvious that this structure has changed. Due to economic necessity and improved health, thought leaders will continue working creating less opportunity for new entrants. In addition, the flat lining of population growth in North America, Europe, Japan and even China means that opportunity provided by growth will be limited. This Baby Boom Log Jam (BBLJ) will be especially pronounced at institutions like universities and research centers where experience is valued and free market forces are less prevalent.
Because of the BBLJ, some of the new crop of the best and brightest will be forced outside the traditional path. However, they are no longer prevented from participating as in the recent past. They have access to information, people and ideas through the internet where even the most cutting edge thinking is available. In addition, it can be accessed without having to succumb to conventional thinking. “If you want tenure, job security or respect from your peers you have to think like us.”
Before these structures were in place some of the greatest scientific advances came from young individuals working alone – Isaac Newton, Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein. Why have there been few groundbreaking discoveries or theories on par with the Laws of Physics, Evolution or Relativity since Einstein?
The BBLJ and internet assures that some young great minds will take the unconventional path especially if he/she already has the proclivity to question the status quo and challenge conventional wisdom. Unlike the recent past, these folks will not be cut off from access to necessary information to formulate their ideas.
What will the Large Hadron Collider reveal?
January 10, 2010I’m fascinated by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the great discoveries that it will reveal. Ironically, I have heard very little about it in the technology community. How might these discoveries impact Open Innovation and Venture Capital? They might change the landscape of technology, making under appreciated technologies high value, and the inverse.
Below is the best article I’ve seen on the LHC, it is a reprint from LA Times written by Steve Giddings (a physics professor at the University of California Santa Barbara) – Ben duPont
———–
Despite all we have learned in physics — from properties of faraway galaxies to the deep internal structure of the protons and neutrons that make up an atomic nucleus — we still face vexing mysteries. The collider is poised to begin to unravel them. By colliding protons at ultra-high energies and allowing scientists to observe the outcome in its mammoth detectors, the LHC could open new frontiers in understanding space and time, the microstructure of matter and the laws of nature.
We know, for example, that all the types of matter we see, that constitute our ordinary existence, are a mere fraction — 20 percent — of the matter in the universe. The remaining 80 percent apparently is mysterious “dark matter”; though it is all around us, its existence is inferred only via its gravitational pull on visible matter. LHC collisions might produce dark-matter particles so we can study their properties directly and thereby unveil a totally new face of the universe.
The collider might also shed light on the more predominant “dark energy,” which is causing the universe’s expansion to accelerate. If the acceleration continues, the ultimate fate of the universe may be very, very cold, with all particles flying away from one another to infinite distances.
More widely anticipated is the discovery of the Higgs particle — sometimes inaptly called the God particle — whose existence is postulated to explain why some matter has mass. Were it not for the Higgs, or something like it, the electrons in our bodies would behave like light beams, shooting into space, and we would not exist.
If the Higgs is not discovered, its replacement may involve something as profound as another layer of substructure to matter. It might be that the most elementary known particles, like the quarks that make up a proton, are made from tinier things. This would be revolutionary — like discovering the substructure of the atom, but at a deeper level.
More profound still, the LHC may reveal extra dimensions of space, beyond the three that we see. The existence of a completely new type of dimension — what is called “supersymmetry” — means that all known particles have partner particles with related properties. Supersymmetry could be discovered by the LHC producing these “superpartners,” which would make characteristic splashes in its detectors. Superpartners may also make up dark matter — and two great discoveries would be made at once.
Read the rest of this entry »